<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libraries: The Next Hundred Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/libraries-the-next-hundred-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/libraries-the-next-hundred-years/</link>
	<description>The murder victim? Your library assumptions. Suspects? It could have been any of us.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Robison</title>
		<link>http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/libraries-the-next-hundred-years/comment-page-1/#comment-22874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Robison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/?p=4541#comment-22874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post was well organized, educational, terrifying and inspirational.  Now I&#039;m curious what my library could be doing differently to prepare for 2113.  I sincerely hope that, as our patrons&#039; lives became increasingly virtual, they will continue to be drawn to the library for a dose of old-fashioned, interpersonal togetherness; the rock concert illustration was fitting.  Thanks for this!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was well organized, educational, terrifying and inspirational.  Now I&#8217;m curious what my library could be doing differently to prepare for 2113.  I sincerely hope that, as our patrons&#8217; lives became increasingly virtual, they will continue to be drawn to the library for a dose of old-fashioned, interpersonal togetherness; the rock concert illustration was fitting.  Thanks for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Bonfield</title>
		<link>http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/libraries-the-next-hundred-years/comment-page-1/#comment-15031</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Bonfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/?p=4541#comment-15031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be great to see library educators publicly discuss their thoughts on training librarians to work in the library of 2112.

As an apprentice library school educator (I&#039;ve completed two years of PhD course work and I taught a library school course two summers ago), what&#039;s most striking to me is how little evidence we collect about the academic achievements of the students we recruit and their relative success after graduation. Williamson recognized the importance of this data and did as much as he could to collect, analyze, and publish this information in his reports. Sadly, almost 100 years later, we still don&#039;t consistently publish information about standardized test scores for library school applicants or matriculates, their undergraduate GPAs, our acceptance rates, students&#039; salaries before and after library school, or how long it takes graduates to find a job. We don&#039;t have the sort of certification that Williamson advocates, and we haven&#039;t come up with an alternative way to assess the knowledge students acquire in the pursuit of their degree. We have no useful longitudinal studies about the career arcs of graduates. We have a truckload of values, but the lawyers and the MBAs have actual data. Until we have something resembling empirical evidence, it&#039;s difficult to believe that we&#039;ll make any rational reforms. Even if we did, how would we know?

That said, I think the library of 2112 is going to require far, far greater understanding of technology than we typically impart. It&#039;s not just that new librarians should be able to look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://meadvillelibrary.org/os/doku.php?id=what_we_use&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Meadville Public Library in Pennsylvania&lt;/a&gt; and think, &quot;That&#039;s cool, they&#039;re using open source software.&quot; The goal should be for new graduates to be able to critique their choices and contribute to even better software than Meadville is currently using. I&#039;ll know we&#039;re headed in the right direction when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jobs.code4lib.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;postings at jobs.code4lib.org&lt;/a&gt; are being filled by overqualified new library school graduates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great to see library educators publicly discuss their thoughts on training librarians to work in the library of 2112.</p>
<p>As an apprentice library school educator (I&#8217;ve completed two years of PhD course work and I taught a library school course two summers ago), what&#8217;s most striking to me is how little evidence we collect about the academic achievements of the students we recruit and their relative success after graduation. Williamson recognized the importance of this data and did as much as he could to collect, analyze, and publish this information in his reports. Sadly, almost 100 years later, we still don&#8217;t consistently publish information about standardized test scores for library school applicants or matriculates, their undergraduate GPAs, our acceptance rates, students&#8217; salaries before and after library school, or how long it takes graduates to find a job. We don&#8217;t have the sort of certification that Williamson advocates, and we haven&#8217;t come up with an alternative way to assess the knowledge students acquire in the pursuit of their degree. We have no useful longitudinal studies about the career arcs of graduates. We have a truckload of values, but the lawyers and the MBAs have actual data. Until we have something resembling empirical evidence, it&#8217;s difficult to believe that we&#8217;ll make any rational reforms. Even if we did, how would we know?</p>
<p>That said, I think the library of 2112 is going to require far, far greater understanding of technology than we typically impart. It&#8217;s not just that new librarians should be able to look at the <a href="http://meadvillelibrary.org/os/doku.php?id=what_we_use" rel="nofollow">Meadville Public Library in Pennsylvania</a> and think, &#8220;That&#8217;s cool, they&#8217;re using open source software.&#8221; The goal should be for new graduates to be able to critique their choices and contribute to even better software than Meadville is currently using. I&#8217;ll know we&#8217;re headed in the right direction when the <a href="http://jobs.code4lib.org" rel="nofollow">postings at jobs.code4lib.org</a> are being filled by overqualified new library school graduates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Greenhill</title>
		<link>http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2012/libraries-the-next-hundred-years/comment-page-1/#comment-14919</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Greenhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 02:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/?p=4541#comment-14919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this Brett. Thought-provoking, and I think you have taken the key values of libraries (or what they should be valued FOR) and extrapolated them nicely into a future.

You leave me with a question, that may be best answered by others, using your article as a jumping-off point. If those of us who teach in library schools are teaching for the 1912 library, then what do we need to be specifically teaching for the 2112 library? Values, like those expressed in the article, we already do by the truckload through every unit we teach - if we are doing are  job right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Brett. Thought-provoking, and I think you have taken the key values of libraries (or what they should be valued FOR) and extrapolated them nicely into a future.</p>
<p>You leave me with a question, that may be best answered by others, using your article as a jumping-off point. If those of us who teach in library schools are teaching for the 1912 library, then what do we need to be specifically teaching for the 2112 library? Values, like those expressed in the article, we already do by the truckload through every unit we teach &#8211; if we are doing are  job right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
